Okay so as I predicted the blog I wrote about... hmm... a half hour ago started a debate. I copied and pasted the conversation so you can read it and get a better outlook on things I didn't think to type, and opinions I did not exaggerate to you. My apologies for being so vague but read below before debating with me... If at the end of reading this you still have "beef" with my point of view lets debate it out. If you want to read the first part of this segment, read the blogpost directly below this one.
"Andrew": not that im opposed to the death penalty...
"Andrew": but
"Andrew": you realize its more expensive for society to have someone on death row than in prison for life, right?
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: well yeah and it may cause over crowding by having individuals wait to die in prison and it may cost us money but theres ways of avoiding that im sure if our high and mighty gov realllyy put their minds to it they could adapt a new system. for example if we stop wasting money on rehab which is where the majority of our funds go, then that money can be focused on the people in prison for life or on death row
"Andrew": the most expensive cost is actually litigation
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: sorry that took so long im tryna pick out an outfit for tomorrow
"Andrew": it costs hundreds of thousands of dollars to put someone to death
"Andrew": due to the appeals process and our wonderful legal system
"Andrew": i wish it wasnt the case
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: well yeah thats why i siad if our gov put their minds to it we could adapt to a new system
"Andrew": yeah
"Andrew": thats where human rights come in though
"Andrew": technically we have to give equal rights and due process to prisoners
"Andrew": so it sucks up money
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: but i feel like in order to interchange this system we need to stop funding rehab. and yeah i know everyone gives me the human rights spew but then again why should prisoners get rights when in order to maintain your rights as a society member youve got to be a productive and not disruptive member of society
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: and by being dispruptive and disobeying our laws, they are giving up their rights by default
"Andrew": right, i agree on that aspect
"Andrew": but then where do you draw the line for due process and human rights?
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: example?
"Andrew": youre saying a manslaughterer, a white collar criminal, and a serial killer all do or do not deserve these rights
"Andrew": thats the tough part, where do you draw the lines for who gets those rights
"Andrew": what types of crimes, etc
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: okay, well manslaughter, rape, child molesters, and big time criminals--- nuke em. white collar crime, honestly we waste so much on them just lock em up with the drug dealers and such because ive seen minimum security prisons with no bars barely any security and not even so much as a fence around the facility for white collar crimes. im not saying nuke em. but im saying they get too many privelages
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: but violent and sexual crimes. are unnaceptable
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: also, habitual re-offenders
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: i say 4 or 5 times and your done.
"Andrew": haha
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: im harsh.
"Andrew": i dont think that ideology would ever work
"Andrew": sorry lol
"Andrew": you cant get enough people to agree with that
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: haha oh i know it wouldnt which is why im not going into the criminal justice system. i would get angry with the lack of harshness in my feild. thats why im going into juvenile justice. where my efforts are not wasted and there is hope
SUNSHiNExBABYB00: thats was the main point of the blog
No comments:
Post a Comment